I'll not argue the merits of an ark of wood built of wood because I think there is a lot more that one should consider when validating that story.
First the story is older than that of the bible retelling:
And then we must look at the logic of the story. Is it possible that a 300 foot ship i.e. ark, could even house the number of animals reported much less the food needed to sustain them all for more than a month?
And finally, if we continue this discussion, and I am willing, we must agree on what is evidence. It must be empirical evidence or it is not evidence.
The dictionary definition of empirical evidence is evidence relating to or based on experience or observation.
Before you come at me with the fact that I did not observe evolution I will conceed. I did not so I will give you that point.
What I will discuss is the existence of a supernatural being. I am not interested in "feelings" or "revelations" I want hard evidence.
Since you DO believe YOU must prove it. I DO NOT believe so there is nothing I can prove.
So are you up for this?